Create project libraries, collections per case study, and notes for research questions, plans, and logs, all linked to your sources and citations. A documented workflow uses subcollections and standardized notes (“Research Control” note, GPS tags, saved searches) to keep plans, evidence, and proof arguments in one coherent structure.
Here’s a concrete Zotero-centered structure you can drop your research plans into, using things you already know how to drive.libnet+3
1. Overall architecture in Zotero
Create one top-level collection per research project or key person, with subcollections for Plan, Evidence, and Writing (or your preferred 00–10 structure).organizeyourfamilyhistory+2
Use notes and tags—rather than new item types—to store the research plan and link it directly to the sources and to your research log.genohistory+2
2. Core objects you’ll use
Collection = project container (e.g., “Clark – Identify parents of X, Muskogee Co.”), mirroring the “individual collection + subcollections” pattern described in current genealogy workflows.reddit+1
Standalone note “Research Control / Plan” = your master research question, objective, and step list, which you can duplicate as a template for new projects (Better Notes helps if you want structured templates).libnet
Child notes on individual sources = mini-log entries attached to each Zotero item, capturing search details, extracted evidence, and correlation comments.genohistory+1
Tags = status (to do, in progress, completed), GPS-related tags (e.g., gps:plan, gps:analysis, gps:proof), family line, locality.zotero+1
3. Suggested subcollection layout
Within a project collection:
00 – Plan & ControlMaster “Research Plan + Control” note
Optional: a separate “Questions/Future To-Do” note
10 – Sources to CheckEmpty items created in advance with titles like “FS film 123456 – Muskogee Co. deeds 1900–1910 (TO DO)”
20 – Evidence CollectedItems with attached images/PDFs for records you’ve captured
30 – Analysis & CorrelationNotes for timelines, correlation tables, FAN analysis
40 – Writing & ReportsDraft proof summaries, report sections, blog outlines
The 00–40 idea follows documented “individual collection + subcollections + control note” workflows other genealogists are using successfully.youtubezotero+1
4. What goes in your “Research Plan + Control” note
Use a single rich-text note (Better Notes if you want outlines) with something like:
Objective: one-sentence research question.
Background summary: 3–6 bullets, with Zotero citekeys or links back to items.
Working hypothesis: 1–2 sentences.
Planned steps: numbered list, each step including: record type, repository/site, target names/dates/places, and a Zotero link to the “placeholder” item in
10 – Sources to Check.Status: a small table (Step / Status / Result note / Date) you update as you work.
Zotero-based handouts emphasize using such “control” notes and tags to replace traditional research logs and to‑do lists while keeping everything in one place.genohistory+2
5. Minimal workflow for each project
Open the project collection and its “Research Plan + Control” note.
For each planned step, create a Zotero item (if not already there) and tag it
status: to-do.When you work the step, open the item, attach any image/PDF, and create a child note recording: search terms, scope, positive/negative results, and extracted evidence.
Update the status tag (
in-progress, thendone) and add a brief summary back into the control note under that step.Use saved searches (e.g.,
status: to-do+ collection = this project) as your live “research plan view.”reddit+2
Here’s a reusable blank “Research Plan + Control” template you can paste into a new Zotero note and save as your standard project template.
1. Research objective
[State the research question in one precise sentence, including identity, relationship, time, and place.]
2. Background summary (known facts)
[Fact 1 with brief citation or note and link to Zotero item.]
[Fact 2 with brief citation or note and link to Zotero item.]
[Fact 3 with brief citation or note and link to Zotero item.]
[Prior negative searches, summarized briefly, with link(s) to negative‑search notes.]
3. Working hypothesis
[Write 1–3 sentences describing your current best hypothesis. Acknowledge uncertainty.]
4. Research plan (numbered steps)
[For each step, you can later add a link to a prepared Zotero item and status tags.]
[Short label for step 1]
Record type / jurisdiction: [e.g., marriage, probate, land; county/state/country.]
Repository / access: [archive, courthouse, website, microfilm, etc.]
Target: [Who/what you are trying to find; names, date range, locality.]
Method note: [Search strategy, key variants, FAN focus, etc.]
Linked Zotero item: [paste item link when created]
Status: [to‑do / in progress / done]
[Short label for step 2]
Record type / jurisdiction: [...]
Repository / access: [...]
Target: [...]
Method note: [...]
Linked Zotero item: [...]
Status: [...]
[Short label for step 3]
Record type / jurisdiction: [...]
Repository / access: [...]
Target: [...]
Method note: [...]
Linked Zotero item: [...]
Status: [...]
[Continue steps 4–10+ as needed, grouping by record type or repository.]
5. Status table
[Add or remove rows as needed.]
6. Questions and future lines of inquiry
[Question or uncertainty 1 you want to keep in view.]
[Question or uncertainty 2.]
[Possible future avenue (different locality, associated family, record type).]
To turn this into a reusable template, you can:
Save a copy of this note in a “Templates” collection and duplicate it for each new project.
Or use your preferred Zotero note add‑on to register it as a named template and insert it into any project note.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Here’s a compact “micro‑plan” control note template for a single repository visit or focused session. Use it alongside the full template rather than instead of it.
1. Session objective
[One sentence: what you want to accomplish in this specific visit/session.]
Example: “Identify all probate files for men named Clark in Muskogee County between 1870 and 1905.”
2. Session context
Project: [link to main project collection or control note.]
Repository / website: [name, URL, catalog link.]
Date & time available: [e.g., 2026‑04‑03, 3 hours.]
3. Targeted tasks (numbered)
[Task 1 short label]
Collection / call no. / URL: [exact reference where possible.]
Record type: [probate index, deed index, microfilm X, database Y, etc.]
Search target: [names, date range, locality, variants.]
Output: [what you will capture—images, abstracts, full transcriptions, negative search note.]
Linked Zotero item: [paste when created.]
Status: [to‑do / in progress / done]
[Task 2 short label]
Collection / call no. / URL: [...]
Record type: [...]
Search target: [...]
Output: [...]
Linked Zotero item: [...]
Status: [...]
[Task 3 short label]
Collection / call no. / URL: [...]
Record type: [...]
Search target: [...]
Output: [...]
Linked Zotero item: [...]
Status: [...]
[Add more tasks as needed; aim for what you can realistically do in the time.]
4. Quick results log (for this session only)
5. Follow‑up actions
[Follow‑up 1, e.g., “Attach images to main Zotero items and create child notes with full abstracts.”]
[Follow‑up 2, e.g., “Update main control note research plan status for steps 3 and 4.”]
[Follow‑up 3, e.g., “Schedule second visit for unexamined volumes.”]
You can keep a master copy of this “micro‑plan” in a Templates collection, then duplicate and adapt it each time you plan a focused session.
No comments:
Post a Comment