Examples Using the Collection + Tag System

 Below are 3 concrete, fully worked examples using the collection + tag system using names, etc., from my personal research on the Dubois line. Each walks through naming, filing, and tagging step‑by‑step.

I’ll assume:

• A separate library that you set up and name

• Collections by person/case with 00–10 (or more) subcollections of your choosing

• Tag set you've developed and added as a "Tag Seed" standalone note in your "* Admin" collection.

---

Example 1: 1900 census household – Dubois family in Ulster Co, NY.

Scenario

You’ve found a 1900 census page on FamilySearch for Tobias Dubois, wife Sarah/Sallyy, and children in Ulster County. The image includes multiple neighboring FAN families you care about.

1. Where it lives (collections)

1. In your left pane, you already have:

   • Genealogy Projects / Case Studies

     • Dubois, Tobias (1768–1855) – Ulster County

       • 05 Occupation & Residence

       • 06 Children

       • 07 Associates & FAN Club

2. Decide the primary reason you value this census:

   • It establishes where they lived and their household structure in 1900 → treat as residence evidence.

3. File the census image item into:

   • Dubois Dpbois (1768–1855) – Ulster County → 05 Occupation & Residence

You’ll link to this same item from Research Notes, FAN notes, etc., but it only lives in this one subcollection.

2. How you name the item

Create the main item (if the connector gave you a messy “web page” record, you can clean it up):

• Item Type:

  • I’d use something like Document (or Book Section if you’re following the more granular census‑volume approach) but keep it consistent across your census items.

• Title:

  • 1900 U.S. census, Ulster County, New York, Marbletown, page 194 )include here a ful description of where this household is in the census) 

• Author:

  • United States. Census Office (12th census) (or similar consistent form you’ve chosen).

• Date:

  • 1900

• Archive / Library Catalog fields:

  • Archive: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)

  • Call Number: include roll (ED / sheet details if you want.)

• URL:

  • Paste the FamilySearch/Ancestry link in the URL field (even if it’s not perfectly stable).

• Extra (if you like Mills‑style detail):

  • Schedule: population; Page: 12A (stamped); Dwelling: 105; Family: 110.

3. Tags on the item

In the right pane, Tags tab, add:

• Status / workflow

  • status: reviewed (once you’ve actually read and evaluated it)

  • If you just captured it: start with status: unreviewed and upgrade to reviewed later.

• Evidence type

  • type: census

  • type: residence

  • type: family structure (optional, if you want this category)

  • type: primary (if you’re treating it that way for residence/relationships)

• GPS / analysis

  • gps: collect at first, then change to gps: analyse when you’re actively correlating, and gps: proof once it’s in a finished argument.

• Line / project

  • line: Dubois

    project: Ulster Co. & Marbletown community

  • 
    

• Place / repository

  • place: Ulster County, New York

  • repo: FamilySearch

Optional: add surname tags for all households on the page, if you like a FAN‑heavy approach, e.g.:

• surname: Dubois

• surname: Dewitt

• surname: Delamater

4. Annotations and notes

Open the attached PDF/image in Zotero’s viewer:

• Highlight the lines for theDubois family.

• Create an annotation note:

  • Comment text:

    • “Dubois household in Ulster County in 1900; supports residence and approximate birth dates of children; neighbors include Davis and Isaac Dubois.”

  • Tags on this annotation (not the whole item):

    • arg: residence

    • arg: household structure

    • line: Dubois

Now later you can search just annotations tagged arg: residence + line: Dubois when writing.

---

Example 2: Same census page reused for a FAN household

Scenario

On the very same 1900 census image, you have a Delamater household who have intermarried with the Dubois. You want to reuse the same source but keep each household clearly documented.

There are two reasonable patterns; here’s the one that plays nicely with your “one item per page” philosophy while still letting you focus on a second household.

1. Reuse the same item for multiple households

You already have that page item (“Dubois household”) in 05 Occupation & Residence. You do not make a second item for theDelamater household; instead you:

1. Add a child note to the same census item:

   • Note title:

     • Household abstract – Delamater family

   • Note body:

     • Transcribe/abstract just the PDelamater household lines.

     • Add any analysis (e.g., “Likely same Delamater family that appears as neighbors in 1900.”).

2. Tag that note (not the whole item):

   • line: Delamater

   • arg: household structure

   • arg: FAN

This keeps the source as one object (the page) while your notes differentiate households.

2. Link to the Delamater case

In Genealogy Projects / Case Studies you also have:

• Delamater, Maria(?–?) – Ulster County

  • 05 Occupation & Residence

  • 07 Associates & FAN Club

In the Delamater case:

• Create a parent Note called Census – 1900 Ulster County (FAN) in 07 Associates & FAN Club.

• In that note, insert a Zotero link back to the 1900 census page item (drag the item into the note or use “Add link to item”).

Now your Delamater case “knows” about the census page via a note, but you haven’t duplicated the underlying record.

---

Example 3: One person, multi‑year census cluster

Scenario

You want to teach how a single ancestor’s census trail (1790, 1800, 1810, 1820) works inside your system. Let’s stick with Tobias Debois and assume you’ve found him in 1790 (as a child), 1800, 1810, and 1820.

1. Collections

Within:

• Dubois,Tobias (1768–1855) – Ulster County

you’ll file by what the record is primarily telling you:

• 1790 census (as a child in parents’ household):

  • Likely: 06 Children (because you’re using it to document Tobias as a child of his parents).

• 1900, 1910, 1920 censuses (as head of household):

  • 05 Occupation & Residence

You might have the exact same item appear in a different ancestor’s case (for his parents, siblings, or children) only via notes and related‑item links, not by duplicating the item.

2. Consistent naming pattern

Each census item’s title:

• 1790 U.S. census, [county & state], [township], ED X, sheet Y, dwelling 151, family 156, [head of household] household

• 1800 U.S. census, [county & state] [township], ED X, sheet Y, dwelling 105, family 110, Tobias Dubois household

• 1810 U.S. census, ...

• 1980 U.S. census, ...

The “head of household household” pattern makes the item list readable.

3. Tags on each census item

Every census item for William gets:

• Status

  • status: reviewed (once examined).

• Evidence type

  • type: census

  • type: residence

  • type: family structure

  • type: occupation (if those columns matter to your case)

  • type: primary (if you’re treating them as such for certain facts)

• GPS / analysis

  • Early on: gps: collect

  • When you correlate across the series: gps: analyse

  • After drafting a proof of identity or parentage based heavily on these: add gps: proof to the individual items used in the final argument.

• Line / project

  • line: Dubois

  • project: Ulster Co. land & Marbletown community (if the whole cluster feeds that project).

• Place / repository

  • place: UlsterCounty, New York or other county as appropriate.

  • repo: FamilySearch or repo: Ancestry.

4. Relationship‑focused notes and annotations

For the identity and linkage side, you want notes that summarize the whole series, not just each page in isolation:

1. Create a stand‑alone note in 01 Identity & Hypothesis:

   • Title: Dubois – census identity summary 1790–1850

   • Body: Short paragraphs comparing age, birthplace, occupation, neighbors, and household structure across all four censuses.

2. In that note, insert linked citations to each census item (drag them from the center pane).

3. Tag this note:

   • gps: analyse

   • arg: identity

   • line: Dubois

Now, when you later search for gps: analyse + arg: identity + line: Dubois, this note pops up as the hub, with links out to each census record.

4. (Optional) For each census PDF/image, create at least one annotation tagged:

   • arg: residence and/or arg: parentage (for 1790)

   • arg: household structure

This gives you fine‑grained highlights you can pull into a proof narrative.

---

How these examples plug into saved searches

Once you’ve created a few items like this, you can showcase saved searches:

• “Clark census trail”8ag is line: Dubois

  • Tag is type: census

• “Cubois residence evidence (all types)”

  • Tag is line: Dubois

  • Tag is type: residence

• “Clark identity arguments in progress”

  • Item Type is Note

  • Tag is line: Dubois

  • Tag is arg: identity

  • Tag is gps: analyse

That’s where people see the payoff: consistent naming + filing + tagging makes the census cluster behave like a well‑indexed mini‑archive.